The OF Blog

Friday, August 27, 2004

Some Problems I See With Reviews

The recent entry regarding Fan Love has generated plenty of discussion, with some of us raising the issue of how one goes about evaluating an author's work. I thought I'd take a few minutes and expound upon the position I took in that discussion.

Book reviews are by their very nature a difficult beast to tame, much less master. In addition to the almost countless personal differences between authors, there are just as many idiosyncracies that reviewers reveal in their commentaries on the books they have read. Some might employ a direct comparison model, examining one book based on another author's work. That approach can work for those familiar with both, but the possibility of reader confusion is greater, especially if that reader is not very well-read on the other author being compared in the review.

Other reviewers tend to focus on the book itself, but without providing much in terms of a frame of reference. One review that bothered me recently was Michael Dirda's review of China Miéville's Iron Council. In his review, I found a few flaws that rendered this review very unhelpful for me. Now I had already read the book by this time, but what I observed not only failed to persuade me to consider the book from his vantage point, but it also made me wonder if he detected any weaknesses at all in the story.

First, I noticed that he uses almost hyberbolic language to describe the author. Adjectives such as "dazzling," coupled with non-contextual comparisons to Nabokov and Alexander Theroux made this occasional critic wonder if Dirda was writing a press release or a balanced review of the book. Sometimes, a little more pedestrian language can go a long way with certain readers trying to decide whether or not a book is right for them.

Secondly, Dirda jumps back and forth from discussing the book and the author, giving the review an uneven feel to it. Is his purpose to discuss the merits of the book or to convince others that Miéville is a cool author? One or the other would be very valid approaches to take, but I was left feeling that his combination of the two weakened his case.

Another thing that bothered me about his review and this is a common complaint I have (and one that I myself have been guilty of in the past) is that of too much plot exposition. While Dirda is not nearly as bad as other reviewers in repeating a book blurb (Harriet Klausner being infamous for doing this), there are still too many comments that resemble a plot synopsis rather than a critique of a book's merits and weaknesses.

But the thing that bothered me most was that Dirda did not seem to address any possible weaknesses in the work. A reader who had read only Dirda's review might be misled into believing that Miéville was a practically flawless writer who wrote universally praised stories. Now I'm not implying that I think Miéville is a bad writer (I happen to enjoy his scenes more than I am frustrated by his buildup to them), but sometimes a brief examination of the problems that many have had with his earlier works would have made a positive review of Iron Council all that much more compelling in comparison.

To be fair to Dirda, however, it is very difficult to write a review that is going to meet most reader expectations. It might be that he expected those reading his review to be unfamilar with China Miéville and that he believed that he needed to introduce the author. However, one could then argue that most neophytes would be better served reading his earlier Bas-Lag novels (Perdido Street Station, The Scar) first, but that is beside the point. Sometimes readers want to be sold on the author before committing to buying the book.

Another problem reviewers face is that of reader expectations. Do they expect to be wowed by the review, or do they want just to know the gist of the plot? Or would they rather know more about how the author constructs his/her sentences and characters and not to have the main focus of the review be on plot exposition? Very difficult set of questions to answer indeed.

So what do reviewers do about it? The answers are as numerous as the number of those reviewing. Some might be unapologetic for coming across as cheerleaders (or for being catty), while others might strive painstakingly for a pros/cons approach to a book. There is no "correct" answer, although it can be argued that for those such as myself, reviewers in general should try to focus more on balancing book description with an analysis of what works and what does not work.

Thursday, August 26, 2004

This is highly illogical

Sometimes, one must accept that life truly is highly illogical. Maybe this explains our love for all things tribble, not to mention pondering the deep connections between a fantasy author's beard and his style of fantasy. But then again, where else but in the madcap world of fantasy/SF fandom can we embrace our Inner Elvis getting in touch with his Imperial Stormtrooper?

Yes, life being a fan of fantasy and science-fiction works is sometimes the greatest!

Wednesday, August 25, 2004

Fan Love

In the 2+ years that OF has been running, we've discussed many things, from movie adaptations of Tolkien to deep explorations of the sources of inspiration for fantasy and science-fiction authors. Yet in all that time, I've learned that nothing gets as much reaction as a simple Author vs. Author or Character vs. Character discussion.

Currently, we're running a series of Quickpolls on favorite characters, in the tongue-in-cheek named Character Quickpoll Series. This is following on the heels of a very successful (and sometimes controversial) Author Quickpoll Series. Over the past five months that we've done these two series of Quickpolls, the level of reader participation has increased markedly, but at what cost?

I participate on a limited basis at a half-dozen other fantasy/SF-related sites, using a variety of screen names. At almost every single one of them, I've noticed what almost amounts to a factionalization of those sites along character/author lines. Nowhere is this more evident than at the SOIAF board. There, in their Other Authors section, one can expect to find plenty of posts devoted to comparing authors, including the linked-to one of Martin versus Jordan. But to be fair, this also occurs with too-frequent occurrance at OF as well, especially when we have been known for taking our potshots at Terry Goodkind and his interview style and how that compares with the perceived qualities of his Sword of Truth series.

Sometimes, comparing authors is a worthwhile endeavor. However, many times, it seems as though we get caught up in a reductio ad absurdum situation. Either a poster will say, "This book is kickass! Buy it now!," or on the flip side, it'll be more along the lines of, "This sucks!" (or sux, or suxx0r, depending on the person and the code language they want to use). Two months ago, Robert Salvatore mentioned the OF Quickpoll in passing when he talked about the negativity that internet websites seem to have toward the non-kosher authors. We had a very honest and open discussion about this issue and I am glad that we resolved matters to our mutual liking.

But Salvatore does raise a very important point. Why is it that many have to believe that they must bash other authors into the ground at the same time that they express their admiration for another author's work? Shouldn't the merits of a George R.R. Martin stand on their own without having to be compared to a Robert Jordan or any other fantasy author?

And that leads into an even more fundamental issue for fans who post on websites. We're not exactly known as paragons of debating. All too often, our attempts to discuss matters breaks down into simple likes/dislikes, without a clear model for determining those preferences. Over at SFF World two months ago, a mini-battle of sorts broke out over how to delineate between "quality" and "non-quality" speculative fiction. But the specifics of that debate are for another post, I fear.

There are two important things to consider here: Why do we like this character/author? How does this character/story work for me? All too often in the constricting confines of internet forums, we have little opportunity to expound upon our initial statements, due mostly to the time it take for us to compose and organize our thoughts on the matter. There are plenty of very intelligent writers that visit these forums, yet even they are sometimes guilty of writing only a sentence or a paragraph and expecting everyone else to see as he/she sees the issue. I know I'm guilty of this in the past.

But what can we do about it? For the time being, apparently not much. Although there are many that are willing to put forth the extra effort required to spark a lively and civilized discourse on how we view authors and their characters, there are many times more of us fans who are content to engage in questions that revolve around a Versus scenario, whether it's Martin vs. Jordan, Erikson vs. Martin, Tolkien vs. Miéville, or if it's a Character Deathmatch sort of setting. Sometimes, in order to get some of the former, we have to indulge others who want the latter.

Hot ARCs

Publishers Weekly is running a two-part series on the forecasted best new books due to be released in the coming months. Autumn is traditionally a time where booksellers are exposed to the hottest new wares out there, and here are a few books that PW thinks will be big hits with the readers:

Margaret Drabble, The Red Queen (Oct. 2004). Novel focuses on an Englishwoman who on the eve of a trip to Seoul, South Korea, receives a 200-year old manuscript written by a Korean princess. PW lauds her for her characterizations and writing style.

Donna Leon, Death in a Strange Country (Jan. 2005). Mystery story about an American soldier who drowns in Venice after being caught in a high-level conspiracy.

Cassandra King, The Same Sweet Girls (Jan. 2005). Story that explores the friendships that six young women have developed over the years and how they deal with one's bout with cancer.

Simon Singh, Big Bang: The Origin of the Universe (Jan. 2005). Lauded as being a great popularizer of science and an intrepid explorer of some of the more fascinating and baffling scientific mysteries, Singh tackles the Big Bang theory. PW notes that this book might do much good for readers of serious non-fiction who are tired of political books.


Someday, ev'rything's gonna be diff'rent

As Bob Dylan sang in "When I Paint My Masterpiece," someday, everything truly will be different. This is just the first step in an experiment to expand the scope of what we discuss over at wotmania's Other Fantasy section. Needless to say, this will be a work in progress and you can expect a lot of variety and occasional bouts of abject weirdness as this Blog develops its own identity.

In the coming months, it is safe to expect reviews of books that aren't necessarily related to the speculative fiction genre. You can look forward to links to other sites and the burning topics related to the spec fic field. And you can even find out the lyrics to the Safety Dance if you wanna. Whatever strange and twisted roads we might travel over the coming months, it should be a long, strange, fun, and warped trip. Sit back and enjoy the ride.

Friday, July 30, 2004

R.A. Salvatore Interview

Below is an interview with R. A. Salvatore, many thanks to him personally and on behalf of the wotmania community for taking the time to answer all these questions so thorougly. I thought about getting into a big introduction to this interview or having something important to say... But then I realized it's late at night, I'm tired, and I should just let the interview speak for itself... Enjoy, it's a great one!

Could you maybe tell us a little about yourself, like how you got into the writing business to begin with, what inspired you to write fantasy, and maybe what you're working on at the moment?

I’m a working-class kid from a blue-collar New England family. My Dad worked for the Post Office and ran a small furniture business on the side. I was the youngest of seven (with five older sisters!), and so, out of simple necessity, I learned early on that I had to work hard for anything I wanted. It was a good lesson.

When I was very young, kindergarten and even pre-k, I was an avid reader and writer. I have an amazing collection of Charles Shultz’s “Peanuts” books, circa 1960's. It’s funny, but the older I get, the more convinced I am that Shultz got so many things exactly right. I would stay home from school often (I had an agreement with my Mom that I could, as long as I got good grades), huddled in my room with these and other books. I wrote books, too, most featuring new adventures with Snoopy.

I loved the world of imagination. I loved to read and to write, but then something happened. As I made my way through school, I kept getting handed books to read that didn’t excite me and didn’t even remotely connect to the realities of my life. “Silas Marner” or “Ethan Fromme” might be great works (I wouldn’t know, as I cannot bring myself to even crack either open), but to a 9th-grader, reading them was nothing more than tiresome work.

It got so bad that by the time I was graduated, the only reading I did was in order to get the grade and the only writing I did was in order to get the grade. I can remember exactly two pieces I wrote in high school that involved any sort of effort: a description of a swamp and a short story which was loosely inspired by “The Day of the Triffids” movie. That short story would become my first manuscript six-to-seven years later.

I started college as a Math/Computer Science major during the infancy of the computer revolution. That first year, 1977, my sister handed me a copy of the white boxed set of the four Tolkien books, “The Hobbit” and “The Lord of the Rings” trilogy. I still remember the look on her face when I asked her what they were about - remember, this was 1977 and there was no “fantasy” genre. The bookstores had maybe three shelves in one bay for “science-fiction” and the fantasy books (meaning Tolkien and the first Terry Brooks’ novel, usually) took up about a fifth of one shelf, if that.

A couple of months later, in February, 1978, New England got clobbered by the worst blizzard in history. Roads simply disappeared. I woke up that morning, hoping we wouldn’t have school (the weatherman said we might get a little snow). I looked out my bedroom window, down to the driveway and my treasured ‘69 Cougar, and low and behold, all I saw was a black spot! I thought my car had been stolen! Of course, when I got downstairs, I realized that the small black spot was the top of the car’s roof.

So we had no school - for the rest of the week. Trapped inside, I pulled out the books my sister had given me, and “WHAM,” my life changed. All I could think while I was reading was “why didn’t someone give me this book to read in the 9th grade?” When I got back to school, I immediately changed my major to Communications/Media, specializing in technical writing/journalism. This meant I would still focus on the math courses that served as my comfort zone, but it allowed me to take all of my electives in the literature area. I suddenly found myself craving those old feelings I used to know in my room with Snoopy and Charlie Brown.

I thought I would set the world on fire when I got out of college. I had done quite well in a field that was growing. Unfortunately, we got hit with a recession in 1981. Rather than working as a tech writer for a computer company, I found myself right back at my job in the factory, the job that had, along with bouncing in local nightclubs, had financed my college career. For eight-to-ten hours a day, I would stand on a metal bench beside a big metal table, loading lumps of scrap plastic into a grinder. It was honest work, certainly, but it was mindless. I was dying. To make things worse, I had run out of fantasy books to read. There was noAmazon.com at that time, no Internet at all where I might find suggestions for further reading.

To save myself, I dug out that old short story from high school and spent my days losing myself in my imagination. Physically, I was working through the motions of grinding plastic, but mentally, I was far, far away. I was turning that old story into a world of my own, and a fantasy novel of my own. I never intended to be a professional writer; as the story developed, the one thing I had in my hopes was that this would be something tangible to separate me from the nameless, numbered masses. I would have something my grandkids could hold up to their kids and say, “Want to know more about your great-grandfather?”

When I finished the book, some friends read it and told me I should send it out. I hired my sister to type it (when I was in high school, you were either on a college track or a business track - the college track ignored typing) and went to the library to learn about submitting books. I sent it to all the usual suspects and got all the usual, and often brutal, rejection letters.

I’ve always been a fighter. If you tell me I can’t, I’ll die trying to prove you wrong. So, while I gave up the notions of publishing at that time, I never stopped editing and refining that book. A few years later, in 1987, I thought I had it ready to go out again. By this time, I was trying to build a career in finance and was married with two young sons. Back to the library I went, to see the updated market information for publishing. One of the places I sent the book was TSR, who had done the Dragonlance novel line, among others. Fortune was with me; not only did I land the book on the lap of an editor who liked my writing, I happened to land it at a time when TSR was looking for someone to write the second Forgotten Realms’ novel. They rejected my book, as they had no room in the schedule for original works, but they offered me the chance to audition for the second novel. “The Crystal Shard” and my writing career were born.

It’s continued to grow and evolve, to places I never imagined. Right now I’m working on the forward for the first Everquest book, by Scott Ciencin, and, well, I’m working on an interview….this interview.

Do you find that the worlds that you write tend to "write themselves," or do you write more to a well-planned or highly structured story?

Definitely they write themselves. It’s an amazing experience. It’s like the characters have come alive and are sitting on my shoulder talking to me, telling me their tales. I do my homework – when I wrote DemonWars, I spent six months just building the world – and I outline every book, but when I get rolling, the story takes on a life of its own.

I wouldn’t have it any other way. Writing a book for me, I expect, is very similar to the experience of reading the book for my readers. I don’t often know exactly what’s coming next, and that makes it more fun. And you know, for me, this entire genre is all about that; it’s all about having fun and getting away from the mundane world for just a little while.

In "The Dark Elf Trilogy, Collector's Edition" you mention that Drizzt (who practically invented himself) underwent the transformation from sidekick to primary hero the moment you began to write him in. Did Wulfgar undergo a similar transformation? It seems that earlier in the Icewind Dale Trilogy that he shows more potential for intelligence than he actually ends up having in the later chapters and books.

I’m trying to make all the characters change and grow, or regress. I’m trying to make these “real” people, even if they happen to be dwarves or elves. People are not static; I’ve seen formerly liberal-minded people become rabid conservatives, for example. I’ve seen people find themselves in stressful situations and undergo huge changes in their outlook and mannerisms.

With Wulfgar, the problems began when his relationship within the group shifted. Here was a guy trying to see the world in a manner similar to Drizzt and Bruenor, his primary adult mentors. However, then he was confronted with a situation where his only examples were the long-standing values and mores of a barbarian people whose traditions were far more narrowly defined. This woman Wulfgar had fallen in love with would not be acceptable to the tribes of Icewind Dale.

Wulfgar closed up, and he paid for his mistake.

Then he went to the Abyss – and this is where I found a real disconnect to some of my fans. It was an amazing experience to read some of the fan letters coming in after “Spine of the World.” Here was a guy who was put in the clutches of a demon, who was tortured not just physically, but emotionally, for six years. Here was a guy whose entire version of reality was manipulated by illusions designed to foster and then destroy hope itself. I remember one letter asking why Wulfgar was acting like a jerk. After all, the letter argued, “he had all of his hit points back.”

I was never really sure whether Wulfgar had died in “The Legacy,” or whether he had just gone away to the Abyss and would return. I always leaned toward the “leave him dead” side of the argument, and it was nothing short of a war between me and TSR that brought me to the other side. I was leaving TSR after “Passage to Dawn.” My contract was up and I had no intention of re-signing after some particularly contentious moments regarding the number of books, the speed with which I would need to write them, and my creative control of the series. I was told, in no uncertain terms, that if I left, they’d find someone else to write Drizzt. Well, there was nothing I could do about that, but I was damned well certain that I wasn’t going to give another writer the hook of bringing back Wulfgar, which I knew TSR wanted. That would have guaranteed a New York Times Bestseller; I wasn’t going to hand that over.

So I brought him back, and was ambivalent about it, but not really too concerned. I was certain that “Passage to Dawn” would be the last Drizzt book of mine, after all.

Then, surprise, Wizards of the Coast bought out TSR and coaxed me back into the fold. So I found myself having to follow the course of Wulfgar’s emotional resurrection. I’ve come to appreciate him again by watching that journey; he’s come full circle and is stronger than ever.

I've read many accounts of authors totally avoiding discussion and speculation of their writing on the internet. What makes you different in deciding to surf websites that contain fans discussing your work?

Masochism?

Great question, but not really accurate. I can almost guarantee that there are many lurking authors; it’s like a car accident. You keep telling yourself not to look, because if 99 people say wonderful things and 1 person says something horrible, guess what you remember? Guess what goes to bed with you at night? I’ll tell you flat-out that I know many, many authors, and I don’t know a single “happy” author.

Also, there are authors and publicists using the Internet to manipulate opinion, both positively for a work and negatively against the competition. I don’t do this and can’t stomach it, honestly. I never have looked upon other authors as “competition.” Never once. Sure, I get jealous of J.K. Rowling! But I thank her from the bottom of my heart for teaching millions of kids that it’s okay to read escapist, fantasy fiction.

For me, exploring the new world of the Internet was a way to take ownership of it. Understanding the mentality of on-line communication was a way to get me out of a depression that was being fed by that car-wreck mentality. In 1999, right as “Vector Prime,” the controversial Chewbacca-killing Star Wars’ book, came out, I lost my brother, my best friend, to cancer. I used the Internet to get away from the pain of the real world, but in there, given the tumult around “Vector Prime,” I found little solace. There were days – many days – where I thought I’d never be able to write again. I didn’t understand the context of a message board, and so I let things get to me that really shouldn’t have bothered me in the least. When I finally took emotional ownership of all of that, I began to smile about my career again.

Also, I enjoy the interaction on the web. It’s as simple as that. Writing is an incredibly lonely job. When people used to tell me that they wanted to be a writer, I would say, “great!” Now I ask, “For God’s sake, why?”

Okay, I’m exaggerating, but the truth is that the Internet can be a powerful tool, both positive and negative, to a writer’s career. Not so much in sales; if sales were any indication, then all of the most attacked writers in the genre would not be the top-selling authors in the genre. Perception is important, however, since many editors frequent the sites, as well. I know of one book series that got cancelled in no small part because of misinformation that was spread about it before the books were even turned in to the editors.

But none of that really answers the question, so much as frames the issue. I didn’t and don’t go to Internet for any business purposes. The book sales for me by this point are way beyond any influence I might have, positively, or others might have, negatively. If I were a beginning author, either with a small press or with print on demand, I certainly would be aggressively frequenting sites. As it is, I don’t even like to talk about my books on the Internet, unless it’s in response to specific questions asked of me. The few Internet discussions I join as R.A. Salvatore (I fight on a political board under a screen name) are about the perceptions of the business.

I do that mostly because I believe that the fantasy business is in terrible trouble right now, for several reasons, not the least of which being the almost Democrat vs. Republican mentality of readers on the Internet. It’s not enough to trumpet someone you like; you have to destroy authors you don’t like, and even worse, you have to denigrate any readers who dare to post a positive remark about said authors as “fanboyz” or the like.

What brought me to Terry Brooks’ site was a request by a couple of regulars on my own site that I chime in on an essay written by China Mieville. I read it and found it somewhat offensive – though nothing terribly new. I’ve been in this business for seventeen years now, and for all that time, I’ve heard about new, maverick fantasy writers who will “save” the genre from the likes of “Tolkienesque” and irrelevant tripe. I find it funny that the same bashed authors back then continue to roll along merrily on their way, telling stories, selling books and answering bags of mail from satisfied readers.

So I put my .02 in, and made an offhand comment about the WotMania Quickpolls in the retort, which I wrote off the top of my head in about fifteen minutes. That comment led to some confusion, so I came over to clarify my position – and found myself in a flame war with one of your regulars. Pretty funny and ironic, actually, when I step back and think about it.

Here’s the thing, for me at least: this is a huge genre now. It wasn’t always so. Not so many years ago, it wasn’t so. There is a tremendous diversity in fantasy today. There are wonderful word-smiths, like Tad Williams and Connie Willis; there are authors espousing a definite political bent, even preaching their personal philosophies; there are amazing world-builders, like Robert Jordan, George Martin and Terry Brooks; there are action-adventure storytellers, yes, like me. I applaud that diversity of style; I’m thrilled by that. But fantasy has always been the ugly stepchild of science-fiction, which has always been the ugly stepchild of literature (with a big “L”. Since the day I started working in this field, I’ve heard this desperate call for fantasy to be recognized as serious literature. It’s fine that some writers want to do (or want to believe that they are doing) something monumental that will change the face of humanity. It’s a natural state for writers; if you don’t have an ego, you don’t belong in this business. I have a different take on fantasy and on what I do. Fantasy has always been entertainment for me, a way to get away from the mundane reality of the world around me. I’d rather be slaying dragons than writing out bills. Also, and this goes back to my personal story, I’ve always considered my work most important, if it’s important at all, for teenagers. My favorite letters are ones that begin “I never read a book until...” or “I couldn’t get my son/daughter to read until I gave him your book.” As someone who found the love of reading beaten out of me back in my own school years, that’s particularly satisfying.

As for the Harold Blooms of the world, or the Kirkus reviewers, bully for them. I really don’t give a care about what they think of my work, or what they think about anything else for that matter. I get the feeling that many people do not understand that books have evolved into a different place in the world today. I was just reading an article that said that something around 120,000 books were published last year. Long gone are the days when one or two writers serve as the “voice of their generation.”

I write my books for myself, for the fun of going on an adventure with the characters I’ve come to know as friends. I don’t publish my books for people who don’t like them; I publish my books for people who do like them.

You see, I don’t WRITE for a living. I PUBLISH for a living. Writing is my love, publishing my career. That is not even a subtle distinction, as anyone in the business knows well.

How different is it to write fantasy and science fiction?

Extremely different, I’d expect. I wouldn’t know, however, as I’ve never written science-fiction, other than the beginning of my first book. I don’t consider Star Wars to be science-fiction; I don’t believe that George Lucas thinks of it that way. I think of it as swashbuckling action-adventure, which is far more in line with fantasy. I’ll leave science fiction to the Greg Bear’s and Ben Bova’s of the world. They bring skill-sets that I simply do not, as this time, possess (like an understanding of post-1980 science, for one small thing!).

How involved in future Star Wars books do you intend to be?

No involvement at all. I’m not even working for DelRey anymore. After my experience with TSR and the surprising return to the Dark Elf books, I don’t rule anything out. I’m certainly still on great terms with the wonderful folks over at DelRey, and I loved working with Lucasfilm. But really, with Dark Elf’s growing success, with my DemonWars world rolling along, with my involvement as Executive Producer of the Everquest book line and my involvement with Atari in creating computer games, I don’t have much time.

What direction do you see the Star Wars universe going in now that EpisodeIII is almost here and the New Jedi Order series is finished?

I’ve heard from everyone around the project that the movies take a darker turn, and this seems obvious just from the known story progression. For the novels, I have no idea of their plans. If someone asked me, I’d suggest that they go back to the “classic” era. Luke, Leia, Han - these are the strengths of Star Wars. These are the characters I think most people are truly interested in adventuring beside.

What is your view on the sudden popularization of the heroic fantasy genre in movies and television? With franchises being snapped up can we believe in any chance of a Drizzt movie or series in the works?

Nothing at present, and of course, I have no control over that. WotC owns the rights, not I. I have a feeling, though, that the backlash is about to begin on fantasy. I fear that Peter Jackson’s work was the high water mark. How do you top that? If Jackson does “The Hobbit” (and I pray he does), it will be wonderful and hugely successful, but honestly, I think it’s going to be hard for anyone to approach the level of success of those movies. Harry Potter is a separate phenomenon all its own, and even that seems to be losing steam in the movies, at least anecdotally. To do a fantasy movie that has any chance of satisfying the Jackson-spoiled audience, a production company is going to have to spend lots of money. Lots of money. It won’t take more than one or two busts to bankrupt the notion of fantasy blockbusters. I think we’re seeing the same thing with the comic tie-ins. Spiderman sells, but do the others?

Even with that pessimistic view, I think it’s a short-term problem. I do expect that someday there will be a Drizzt movie or series. I hope so. This always goes in cycles, like a giant wave. At the moment, I think we’re on the back side of the crest. Very few writers in the genre are increasing their audience with successive books at this time, and very, very few are able to make a living unless they’re writing six or eight books a year.

I would like to know if you have anymore of the world of Corona in your mind than the small portion we see in the Demon War series' or is that the only part of the planet that you've thought to create?

It’s not that small! Corona is a living project. I expect to write more books set there; I doubt I’ll ever create a new fantasy world. Why would I have to, since I’ve put all that I wanted in a fantasy world right there. That was my plan all along. I wanted to write my “epic” series that defined the world, its magic system and social and political structures that could serve as a base for stories I wanted to tell in the future, and even for stories that other authors might write. Right now, Jim Lowder, a writer for whom I have tremendous respect, is working on a Corona novel, with his own characters and in a time of his choosing. He is bound only by the general systems and geography of the world. This is an experiment in a new way of franchising a world. I firmly believe that there is an audience of readers out there who don’t want to have authors re-create the wheel with each new series. Readers who like the idea of a common ground through which they can adventure. Yes, the dreaded “shared world.” Some readers want to see the single-author world-building, and for them, there’s no shortage of vibrant and detailed projects underway. Other readers might not want to be quite so invested in learning a new world, a new magic system, with each book.

How much would you agree or disagree with Scott Bakker's comments on epic fantasy, which we conveniently have quoted directly from our own interview with him here at Wotmania:

"Unfortunately, 'epic fantasy' has even less cache than 'SF' - I would guess it's presently somewhere between 'porn mag' and 'harlequin romance.' Perhaps this will change, and 'epic fantasy' will gain something of the camp cache presently being enjoyed by, for instance, 'space opera' - afterall, the rehabilitation of the marginal and devalued is a very postmodern thing to do. Either way, the thing, it seems to me, is to be wary of the implicit judgments in the terms we use. I find it amusing that the people most likely to complain that SF&F is a 'literary ghetto' are often those most likely to devalue other regions of the barrio, particularly when it's as commercially successful as Jordan's work. It's cool to be an iconoclast, I guess. It makes us feel oh-so individual, when in fact we're simply being aristocratic."

Let me repeat his last two lines: “It's cool to be an iconoclast, I guess. It makes us feel oh-so individual, when in fact we're simply being aristocratic."


Now that’s beautiful. I’ve never met Mr. Baker, nor have I read his work. After reading the entirety of that interview, I’ll have to find some time to remedy that.

I agree with him completely. Look, I’m a plain-speaking, blue collar New Englander, educated in public schools (both high school and college). I started going for my Masters Degree in Literature, and after about three classes, I left in disgust. Honestly, if one more author starts quoting Joseph Campbell to me, I’ll choke him! I cannot imagine preparing an outline with such “theories” in mind. It’s not the way I think and certainly not the way I work. Nor do I have any plans to examine writing in that manner. To me, it defeats the whole purpose of a work by taking all the fun out of it.

I remember sitting on a panel at a convention several years ago when all the other panelists were going in circles about theory, about Campbell, about deconstructionalism, about yada yada yada. My eyes were glazing over, as were the eyes of most of the three hundred people in attendance. Out of the blue, the moderator looks over at me and asks, “What do you think, Bob?”

They really didn’t want to know, believe me. So I just shrugged and said “I dunno. I just make stuff up and people like to read it.”

The bottom line is that people want different things from their reading experiences. Some people read the Drizzt books, for example, and enjoy them as a fun romp. Pure, fun pulp. Cool!

Other people read them and dismiss them as “popcorn.” Okay, that’s their entitled opinion. Still other people read them and write me letters about how these books had a profound impact on their lives. There was a great story many years ago about a book store robbery here in New England. True story. Someone broke in and stole most of the Dungeons and Dragons material, which was very popular among teenagers, of course. Among the items stolen was my “Homeland” novel. Well, a couple of days later, all the material was returned, with a note from the thief explaining that Drizzt had become his hero, and if Drizzt was his hero, then how could he be a thief?

Another time, I was in South Philly, signing books at a very cool store – I think it was a Media Play. There was this young black man, dressed in the floppy, crotch-at-your-knees style I’d expect of the inner city. As I was signing, I noticed that he kept moving back in the line. Every time more people came in, he’d usher them in front of him. With my typical small-town naivete, I began wondering (just a wee bit in the back of my mind) if maybe I was going to get robbed. Did this guy think the people were giving me money for the books. Man, I was such a parochial putz!

I finally get through the line, and the young man presents himself quite well. “Hi, I wanted to get to the end, because I wanted to talk to you for a bit. Is that okay?”

“That’s why I’m here,” I replied.

“A couple of years ago, I had never read a book,” he explained. “I figured if a book was any good, they’d have made it into a movie. I was playing D&D with some friends and the DM threw a copy of your book at me. He said I should read it because you wrote characters like the ones I played. I threw it back at him, but he insisted. So I took it home. I started reading that night. I didn’t stop until I had to leave for school the next morning. I never read a book like that before.”

I began to get that warm feeling I had known on that snowed-in day in February, 1978, huddled with Bilbo Baggins.

“I just wanted you to know that,” he said. “I’m starting college this year as a Literature Major at Temple University.”

So there you go. We fantasy writers are in the ghetto of literature? Okay, if you say so, but I’ll bet that many fantasy writers have very similar stories to tell. I’m not going to apologize for what I do, and the beauty of it all is that if what I do doesn’t fill the needs of some fantasy writers, there are now dozens and dozens of options each and every month. That’s the peculiar thing about being a writer; could you imagine going up to a home builder and criticizing him for not building the Taj Mahal? This “ghetto” isn’t a bad place to be.

Do you have any desire to do some kind of collaborative work with another author who also writes in the world of the Underdark, such as Elaine Cunningham?

No, I really don’t. The only author I’ve entertained the notion of collaborating with was Terry Brooks. We’ve tossed the idea around. At one point we were wondering what DelRey might do for the third Star Wars’ novelization; we wondered what it might be like to write it together. Really, though, writing is too personal an experience for me. I don’t think I could surrender the control enough to let someone else into that process.

What do you find is the ideal environment to write in? Outdoors? In a closet? In the rain? With green eggs and ham?

Wherever and whenever I can. Mostly I write on my laptop these days. The kids are off at school and my wife and I hang out during the day. I write a little, drink a little coffee (okay, a lot of coffee), write a little more. I’m in the process of remodeling my office, however. I’m trying to clean it up and make it a bit more inspiring. I’ve spent the last few months on vacation, recharging the creative batteries. I feel as if I’m in a new stage of my career now. I’m over that hump and I’m not going back to the other side. I’ve earned a bit of freedom, creatively and in the number of books I write. Now I’m trying hard to integrate my writing into a different phase of my life. The kids don’t need me anymore (except my daughter, who needs to raid my wallet at every turn). It’s a good place to be (my life, I mean, and not the wallet!).

What other authors do you read?

It’s funny, but I just don’t read much fiction anymore. I think being a writer has a way of destroying that pleasure; it’s my biggest regret about my chosen profession. I cannot read a book without acting like an editor, instead of just enjoying what this other creative person is offering to me. Right now, I’m reading a stack of political books. I see the upcoming election as the most important of my lifetime and I want to make the best choice possible. Just as importantly, when people talk about the election, I want to contribute an informed opinion to conversations that seem so incredibly misinformed these days. Remember, I went to school to study Communications/Media, which meant quite a bit of training in the field of journalism. What I see out there passing as “journalism” these days makes my stomach turn.

Drizzt and Elbyran turned out to be remarkably similar, aside from one being Drow and the other human, both being a Philosphical Ranger. What this intentional or did it write itself out that way?

I don’t think they’re that much alike below the surface. This is also a bit of a purposeful inside joke. People who have read the first trilogy of the seven-book DemonWar series will understand that Elbryan is, in a very definitive way, the anti-Drizzt. I knew what was going to happen in “The Demon Apostle,” the third book in the series, when I started writing the first one. Maybe, just maybe, just possibly, just a wee bit in the back of my mind, I had a subconscious desire to give some of the most vocal Drizzt fans what they seem to be crying out for (and be careful what you wish for!) on the massage boards.

Hey, if I can’t have a little fun with it, then what’s the point? I’m not going to change the real world – none of us writers really are, in fantasy or in any other genre. I’m just plodding along like any other guy, trying to make sense of life and death and trying to have a little fun.

R.A. Salvatore

Friday, January 23, 2004

M.R. Powers Interview

The Author: Michael R. Powers is professor of risk and insurance at Temple University’s Fox School of Business in Philadelphia. He received his bachelor’s degree in applied mathematics from Yale University, and his Ph.D. in statistics from Harvard. A former public official with the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, he has consulted for both business and government, and has published numerous scholarly articles. He lives with his wife and two sons in Swarthmore, Pennsylvania. Icons is his first novel.

The Book: M. R. Powers’ debut novel, Icons, revolves around the discovery of an old Eastern Orthodox religious icon.

The story begins with a premonitory dream in which computer scientist George Chen is propelled—by the power of a mutable religious icon—to re-live several poignant experiences from childhood. One of these is his first encounter with Sofia, a mysterious young girl who was a cancer patient at the same time as George. Shortly thereafter, he comes into possession of an unusual icon of St. Raphael that had been left for him by Sofia.

Mary Chen, George's twelve-year-old daughter, is the first to discover the power of the icon, and she subsequently disappears. Fearing Mary to have been kidnapped, George soon learns her whereabouts from Professor MacKnight, a garrulous mathematician. The Professor explains that Mary has unwittingly fallen under the control of a brilliant tyrant who plans to use a science of consciousness, beliefs, and "expectation fields" to prepare an assault on our world.

In the course of the adventure, the reader explores themes of maturity, chance, free will, and metaphor, against a backdrop of discussions ranging from computer chess to religious experience. Imbedded in the novel are two subordinate stories—The Gurkha Story and the history of Sofia’s icons—that introduce and develop concepts important to the basic themes.

The Questions:

Writing Habits
    When/how/why did you decide to start writing?

    I always enjoyed writing short stories when I was in high school. However, apart from one freshman English class, I spent most of my time in college studying applied mathematics and the social sciences. To some extent, my current writing style developed through the practice of expositing mathematical models, which is what I do in my research articles. Consequently, I have a predilection for brevity: cutting to the quick in story development, and an almost total absence of physical character-description. This means that I have more time to focus on the remaining story elements: storyline, themes, tone, and the selection/juxtaposition of individual words.

    Approximately how much do you write per week/month?

    On the average, I spend at least thirty hours per week engaged in writing: correspondence, research papers, or fiction. For novel writing, I like to set aside long stretches of time with few distractions. Consequently, I do most of this work during major breaks in the academic calendar.

    Do you spend much time on editing/rewriting?

    Yes. Writing the initial draft is taxing because it’s best left to the subconscious mind, which requires suppressing/distracting the conscious mind for extended periods of time. I much prefer the stages of editing and rewriting, when the conscious mind can be fully in charge. While good language and good ideas flow from the subconscious in preparing the first draft, it’s through the subsequent revisions that I begin to understand more clearly what I’m trying to say. I find this period of discovery very gratifying.

    When you start a novel, do you know the ending already, or do you let it come naturally from the story as you write?

    I generally use extensive notes (to guide the subconscious) in writing the first draft. These include some idea of how things will come out in the end, but not the specific details. Composing the end of a story is the most challenging part, because ideally it should be both inevitable and unpredictable—a difficult combination that requires much reflection, rewriting, and finesse.

    Which authors have had the greatest influence on your writing?

    I’ve always been impressed by Samuel Beckett’s discipline of writing in French (a second language) to avoid introducing superfluities into his work. So I think my commitment to brevity is partly due to reading his plays (as well as the exercise of writing mathematical papers). In terms of themes, I’d say that C. S. Lewis and Stanislaw Lem have had the biggest influences. My favorite Lewis story is The Dark Tower (an unfinished work); its tone is magnificently disturbing.

    Are there any authors that you are particularly fond of at the moment? What are the last three books you have read?

    Overall, my favorite authors are Stanislaw Lem and Fyodor Dostoyevsky. I feel very fortunate not to have finished reading their complete bodies of work, because I still have much to look forward to.

    I was very pleased that Lem’s Solaris received some attention because of the recent motion picture; but I’m afraid I was disappointed in the movie. I thought the most interesting part of the book was the ongoing description of the planet’s bizarre behavior, which lay just beyond the grasp of human understanding. This aspect was largely ignored in the movie.

    The last three books I’ve read (in reverse chronological order) are: The Quiet American (Greene, second reading); His Master’s Voice (Lem); and The Moon Is a Harsh Mistress (Heinlein).


    Many of our readers are aspiring fantasy/sci-fi writers. Being a relatively “new” author yourself, could you explain how you got to be published for the first time? What steps were necessary?

    My entrance into writing was somewhat unusual, in that I never formally planned a career as a writer, and my educational background reflects that. Instead, the idea of writing a novel coalesced over a number of years, and was strongly influenced by personal circumstances.

    When I finally got started on Icons, I deliberately treated publication as a secondary concern. My thinking was that I wanted to write the kind of book that I would like to have read as a teenager—and would still like to read today—even if that meant that it wouldn’t fit neatly into any of the pigeonholes that publishers use to characterize fiction. I’m convinced that this attitude helped my writing, but it also made the publication process more difficult.

    Several of the publishers I contacted simply didn’t know what to make of Icons. One stated that he/she couldn’t quite decide whether the book was science-fiction, fantasy, or young adult fiction. Another wrote that he/she found the book intriguing, but “too cerebral” for young adult readers. Fortunately, several publishers took the time to read the entire manuscript, and I received some very supportive comments even from those that felt the novel didn’t quite fit their “lists”.

    Finally, I received an offer from Dry Bones Press, a small publisher near San Francisco with an interest in fantasy, science-fiction, spirituality, and patient experience. In short, it appears that a crucial component in establishing a relationship with a publisher is to find one with shared interests.


On Icons
    Where can Icons be found?

    Icons is available on-line (from amazon.com, borders.com, barnesandnoble.com, etc.). Also, readers of wotmania can support their favorite website by purchasing the book through the wotmania Bookstore .

    PLEA TO WOTMANIACS EVERYWHERE: ASK YOUR LOCAL BOOKSTORE TO CARRY ICONS!


    Is there a topic not covered in Icons? ;-)

    I interpret your question as an indirect inquiry into the book’s abundance of themes: dreams, religious icons, artificial intelligence, chance, serious illness, consciousness, the mind-body problem, free will, time travel, parallel universes, metaphor, good vs. evil, growing up, etc. As I mentioned earlier, when one spends less time on story and character development, one has much more time for the presentation, exploration, and interplay of a variety (a proliferation, really) of themes. To me, each theme is like a shard of beautifully colored glass that one finds mixed in with a lot of useless debris. The idea is to identify the theme, polish it, and then find a place to fit it into the story, just as one would fit a beautiful shard of glass together with others to form a stained-glass window.

    What were the most difficult aspects of writing Icons? The characterization, the concepts, the plot? Something else?

    Apart from constructing the ending (which I already mentioned), the most difficult aspect was composing the parts of the narrative that are necessary to carry the storyline from one point to another, but which are not very intellectually stimulating in and of themselves. One can recognize these portions of Icons because they are the only places (in that theme-ridden book) where no themes are introduced or highlighted. To continue the metaphor of my previous answer, these sections would correspond to the leaden material used to hold pieces of stained glass together.

    How much of yourself do you tend to put into your characters? Do they resemble you in any way?

    To some extent, every character reflects certain aspects of my life—viz., elements of my history and circumstances, or personality. Undoubtedly, those characters that are most obsessive (for better or for worse) are the ones that resemble me most.

    Where do you get your ideas? Are they based on particular experiences of yours, on true stories, or do you just use your imagination?

    My ideas derive from all of the above, but probably the biggest source is my dreams. That’s why Icons pays great homage to the power and importance of dreams.

    Could you give us an example of something from Icons that was inspired by a dream?

    One good example is the two Towers of Deebs. The original inspiration came from the image of two large, ancient cathedrals, built on the scale of a modern skyscraper, and standing out starkly as the only buildings in a vast, mildly hilly landscape. As I viewed the two impressive structures in my dream, I noticed that their only difference seemed to be that one was slightly narrower than the other. I was very puzzled by this, and the image remained fixed in my mind.

    Where did you get the ideas for The Gurkha Story and the history of Sofia’s religious icons?

    The story of Olena—Sofia’s ancestor—is based upon a story that my Ukrainian grandmother once told me about a young girl who lived alone, but was sometimes seen in the company of mysterious strangers. As the girl’s worried neighbors eventually discovered, the strangers were actually a group of saints that watched over her (in response to her prayers). It was a natural step to connect this story with the icons of the archangels and their supernatural powers.

    The Gurkha Story was more deliberately constructed to elaborate two specific ideas: (1) that an act whose evil consequences occur with probability less than 100 percent is still an evil act; and (2) that for free will to exist, one has to be able to avoid the apparent paradox that an individual’s selection of his/her moral philosophy must be based upon his/her moral philosophy.


    Do you plan on writing sequels to Icons? Do you have any other projects?

    Icons is planned as the first in a series of four novels. The second book—The Logopath—is already completed. It’s not really a sequel in the conventional sense—i.e., the story and characters are not ostensibly related to the first book. However, the separate threads of the two books will be joined together in the third book (a work-in-progress, tentatively titled I, John). The fourth book (Gnosis) will continue the story, weaving together most of the significant themes from the previous books.

Thank you to Dylanfanatic and Dodge for letting me blatantly rip off their interviews and reviews for ideas. Plus, thank you to Alric seVinta for help with formatting, promoting and posting.

Thank you to grogg0316 and Gwenhwyvar for helping me come up with original questions.



Alric: On behalf of wotmania, I'd like to extend our thanks to M.R. Powers for taking the time to answer questions and provide interesting insight into his process. Also, thank you to smaug who put this interview together.
 
Add to Technorati Favorites