The OF Blog

Friday, January 11, 2013

Robert Jordan and Brandon Sanderson, A Memory of Light

After nearly 23 years and countless millions of words vomited out upon thousands of pages, Robert Jordan's The Wheel of Time series finally concludes with its 14th volume, A Memory of Light.  It has been a memorable series for those who've read, it albeit for some such as myself, it has become more an exercise in patience and restraint, waiting to see if the payoff justifies to any extent the laborious parsing of repetitive descriptions, redundant sentences, clothing and furniture porn, hackneyed villain motivations, etc.  My own opinion of the series has fluctuated between a diversion during my last semester of grad school in the Fall of 1997 (it was a change of pace from reading Hitler's memoirs and speeches for my grad seminar/research) toward it being a repetitive, poorly structured (and written) clunker of a novel/series.  Three years ago, I wrote a series of posts on re-reading the Jordan-penned books, most of them for the first time since the release of the ninth book back in November 2000, and the re-reads did little to improve my deepening dislike for the series.  Yet the first semi-posthumous release, co-written by Brandon Sanderson, I thought at first was a marked improvement.  That was before I began to understand while reading the second co-written volume, Towers of Midnight, that the planned three-volume conclusion to the WoT series was terribly flawed in terms of narrative structure, characterization development, and prose.  Therefore, it was with some trepidation that I ordered A Memory of Light and read it over the past three days.  Unfortunately, it is one of the worst-written books in a series renowned for its mediocre, bloated prose.

In reviewing A Memory of Light, many references will be made to the series as a whole and to specific plot/prose points, as the WoT series is designed as much to be a single "novel" (one that consists of over 3 million words) as anything else, as there is not as many episodic "closing points" vis-à-vis other massive epic fantasy novels of recent years.  As a conclusion to WoT, A Memory of Light at first glance would seem to meet fan/reader expectations:  there is a lot of action and movement, plus several characters have their arcs come to a close.  Those who enjoy hundreds of pages of "battle scenes," with good and evil characters pitted at each other in a series of personal and group duels, doubtless will be thrilled to know that there's a single chapter of nearly 200 pages that covers much of the fighting.  Those who wrote "theories" about possible plot foreshadowings almost certainly will be excited at which of their predictive guesses came true and which ones had surprising conclusions.  In other words, those who read the series in order to place themselves as a sort of textual sleuth will find much more to like from this book than those who read books in order to enjoy the writing and the development of narrative, scene, and characters.

If The Gathering Storm and Towers of Midnight suffered because of an unwieldy narrative that saw massive time jumps (including scenes in consecutive chapters that were separated by nearly a month's worth of narrative time; some characters would have done something in one scene while in the next they would have no knowledge of it, since that was in their "future"), A Memory of Light suffers from an odd compression/expansion of character action and dialogue that makes it difficult at times to focus on what is transpiring.  For example, the first 250 pages or so of this massive 909 page novel are devoted to pre-planning for the prophesied "Last Battle," with prior ally fault lines discussed in detail yet once again, only for there to be sudden mini-conclusions that make the events feel extraneous.  There is a nasty habit throughout the series for the author(s) to re-explain what had already been covered previously.  Scenes such as the one below, when the main leader, Rand al'Thor confronts in a dream his ancient foe (and apparently suddenly his old friend; this development is one of many that is not satisfactorily explained), have their narrative power weakened considerably with reiterations of previously-discussed things:

Moridin, like many of the Forsaken, had usually entered Tel'aran'rhiod in the flesh, which was dangerous.  Some said that entering in the flesh was an evil thing, that it lost you a part of your humanity.  It also made you more powerful. (pp. 135-136)

Jordan/Sanderson (from what I can tell, the majority of the first 2/3 of the novel is Sanderson's writing) devotes too much time to reiterating past statements.  If WoT is to be viewed, as Jordan apparently wished, as a multi-volume novel, then its overuse of description weakens the effect of scenes considerably.  Instead of having this antagonist represent his threat through simple action, the author(s) instead have decided that it is best to have the PoV character think yet once again about the situation.  While some might believe that this reinforces certain narrative events/character traits, what happens in most cases is that the character is stripped of his/her ability to convey a true sense of urgency because s/he has now slipped into a mini-soliloquy that detracts from the scene itself.  If this were even only an occasional matter, it would not be too great of a hindrance, but it happens so frequently that it greatly wounds the narrative flow, reducing the internal action of the first half of the novel to a herky-jerky, sputtering mess.

Yet by roughly the halfway point, the narrative changes as the series of conflicts finally bubbles over.  The bloated expansion of character monologues within their interactions with others is reduced, yet a curious reversal takes place.  Due to the authors' development of dozens of subplots and characters, the narrative tries to focus on a whole slew of angles on four different battlefields stretching over a few weeks' time.  The problem with that is that a great many of these get quick, cursory resolutions (usually death or maiming) that do not justify the great amount of time spent on them throughout the series.  While it could be argued that these numerous subplots are necessary in order to underscore the main thrust of the Dark One/Dragon Reborn duel, that of the will to fight, the narrative would have benefited if it had been pared down to a handful or less other PoVs during the final 1/3 of the novel.  There is an attempt at pathos, yet it falls well short of its potential because despite all of the verbiage spewed throughout the series, so many of these characters lack any true sense of character.  Doubtless some will disagree and say that Characters X, Y, and Z moved them to laughter and/or tears, but can the same be said for the whole cast of hundreds?  It is understandable that the authors compress these character thoughts/actions into shorter (often a paragraph or two moments) segments during the battles themselves, yet the end result is this unevenness of characterization that weakens the intended effect when several of them die.

It certainly does not help that the prose is perfunctory at best.  Sanderson is not a gifted stylist, but having to work within the constraints of Jordan's clunky prose does him no favors here.  Too often, he tries to capture the essence of Jordan's prose by emulating his detailed descriptions, but scenes such as the death of Gawyn suffer because the attention to scene detail detracts from the emotional aspect:

Somehow Gawyn managed to push himself up to his knees.  His heart cried out; he needed to return to Egwene.  He began to crawl, blood mixing with the earth beneath him as it seeped from his wound.  Through eyes clouded with cold perspiration, he spotted several cavalry mounts twenty paces ahead, poking at blackened tufts of grass at their feet and tethered to a picket-line.  After minutes of struggle, an impossible interval of time that left him drained, he pulled himself up on to the back of the first horse he could reach and untether.  Gawyn hunched over, dazed, grasping its mane in one hand.  Summoning his remaining strength, he kicked his heel into the animal's rib cage. (p. 664)

To some, this might be acceptable, because it sets up the area around him and his struggle to live, but what happens in this scene and others is a reduction of the human struggle to a background element.  There is no exploration of his thoughts, no insight into his character, no sense of regret over the foolish actions that led to a foolhardy duel.  Instead, this paragraph is to serve as a commentary on Gawyn's after-fight state, as the scene immediately shifts to another part of the battle.  The chance of revealing more of his character through his futile fight to live is lost by the division of the main fight scenes into a lengthy, nearly 200 page chapter that does little besides emphasize the chaotic nature of fighting.

Many more examples could be cited here of the authors' questionable choice of using overly detailed scene descriptions to serve in place of real, actual character development.  However, there is the risk of losing sight of the novel's other structural issues, that of how A Memory of Light is developed as a singular novel.  As a last volume in a series, its true beginning lies within the previous 13 novels, yet its form is that of a stilted 250 pages of pre-battle scenes followed by quick action scene after quick action scene.  There are few good transitions; all are swallowed by the quickly-shifting PoV perspective moves, causing the narrative to lurch and stop-and-start its way forward, as certain strands are lost for 50 pages or more before resurfacing briefly.  There is no elegance to it, nothing that feels smooth.  Of course, some might argue that this is precisely the point when it comes to depicting a violent conflict, yet here in A Memory of Light, there is little actual movement beyond the fight.  It means so little, outside of the scenes involving the Dragon Reborn's duel.  Compared to the final Malazan Book of the Fallen novel, The Crippled God, the fighting scenes here are weaker because it has taken so long to get to the point of fighting that it is so abrupt of a transition to the deluge of deaths.  There is little of the Malazan book's emphasis on the whys of the fight (outside of saving the world from evil forces); it feels paint-by-numbers in its initial sketchiness and in the quality of the narrative and thematic "paint" used to fill in the spaces.

When I reviewed Towers of Midnight, I commented somewhere that the sum of that novel was lesser than its parts.  This certainly is also the case with A Memory of Light.  It is understandable that fans who have awaited a decade or more for the series to be complete to be content or satisfied with knowing what finally happens.  But novels aren't judged solely by plot information.  It is difficult to imagine re-reading this book for its prose or for its development of theme or characterization.  It is a bloated work in a series infamous for its "fatness."  The writing does not serve the authors' aims in developing the scenes and the dialogues largely feel stilted and devoid of any real depth of human emotion.  Even the long-awaited conclusion suffers from its abruptness intermingled with unexplained actions that are designed more to keep the hardcore fans "theorizing" about their import than to provide any semblance of a tale that concludes at a proper resting point.  WoT as a whole is a series that is not read for much beyond its ability to facilitate reader predictions and now that it is "complete," there is very little to recommend it to readers.  The writing is at best mediocre and often is very poor; the characterizations are tinny, leaving many readers with a bad taste in their mouths; the overarching themes regarding balance, the struggle of good and evil, and free will are presented in a hackneyed fashion that may only appeal to those who have not seen these issues treated by more talented and perceptive writers.  The only good reason that I could give for reading this book is for readers to find out what happened next.  It is not the sort that I would think would make for a rewarding re-reading experience, as there is virtually nothing to offer beyond readers trying to figure out the authors' narrative game.  But if you've read anything in this series, you already knew that, right?  Recommendation to burn after reading it, if you must read it.

Interesting Top 100 book list from Lit Net

They recently did a new reader poll of favorite books and while I've read the majority of them, more unread on this list than I expected.  Needless to say, it's mostly Euro-American in focus.  Bold for books I've read, italics for those I own but haven't yet read, and plain for unread/not owned works:

1. The Bible
2. Hamlet by William Shakespeare
3. The Divine Comedy by Dante Alighieri
4. The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald
5. The Brothers Karamazov by Fyodor Dostoevsky
6. Ulysses by James Joyce
7. Moby-Dick by Herman Melville
8. Don Quixote by Cervantes
9. War and Peace by Leo Tolstoy
10. Crime and Punishment by Fyodor Dostoevsky
11. Anna Karenina by Leo Tolstoy
12. The Odyssey by Homer
13. Paradise Lost by John Milton
14. In Search of Lost Time by Marcel Proust
15. Lolita by Vladimir Nabokov
16. Les Fleurs du mal by Charles Baudelaire
17. The Illiad by Homer
18. One Hundred Years of Solitude by Gabriel Garcia-Marquez
19. Essays by Montaigne
20. The Stranger by Albert Camus
21. The Oresteia by Aeschylus
22. Infinite Jest by David Foster Wallace
23. Heart of Darkness by Joseph Conrad

24. The Story of the Stone by Cao Xueqin (read first volume, own others)
25. Blood Meridian by Cormac McCarthy
26. To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee

27. The Tale of Genji by Murasaki Shikibu
28. Emma by Jane Austen
29. Jane Eyre by Charlotte Bronte
30. The Decameron by Giovanni Boccaccio

31. Eugene Onegin by Pushkin
32. Watership Down by Richard Adams
33. The Sound and the Fury by William Faulkner
34. Les Miserables by Victor Hugo
35. Walden by Henry David Thoreau
36. The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn by Mark Twain
37. Leaves of Grass by Walt Whitman
38. Pride and Prejudice by Jane Austen
39. Tess of the d’Urbervilles by Thomas Hardy
40. The Trial by Franz Kafka

41. Lord of the Rings by J.R.R Tolkien
42. Shahnameh by Ferdowsi
43. The Canterbury Tales by Geoffrey Chaucer
44. Madame Bovary by Gustave Flaubert
45. Fictions by J.L. Borges
46. El Aleph by J.L. Borges
47. A Christmas Carol by Charles Dickens
48. Tender is the Night by F. Scott Fitzgerald

49. The Magus by John Fowles
50. Life and Fate by Vasily Grossman
51. Testament by R.C. Hutchinson
52. Zorba the Greek by Nikos Kazantzakis
53. A Song of Ice and Fire by George R.R. Martin
54. Thus Spoke Zarathustra by Friedrich Nietzsche
55. Oedipus the King by Sophocles
56. The Hobbit by J.R.R. Tolkien
57. Slaughterhouse-Five by Kurt Vonnegut
58. Waiting for Godot by Samuel Beckett
59. The Marriage of Heaven and Hell by William Blake

60. Naked Lunch by William S. Burroughs
61. Fifth Business by Robertson Davies
62. Notes from Underground by Fyodor Dostoevsky
63. Tropic of Cancer by Henry Miller

64. No Exit by Jean-Paul Sartre
65. Othello by William Shakespeare
66. Gulliver’s Travels by Jonathan Swift
67. Vanity Fair by William Thackerey

68. Resurrection by Leo Tolstoy
69. Voss by Patrick White
70. Wuthering Heights by Emily Bronte
71. Manfred by Lord Byron
72. A Tale of Two Cities by Charles Dickens
73. Far from the Madding Crowd by Thomas Hardy
74. The Sun Also Rises by Ernest Hemingway
75. Outer Dark by Cormac McCarthy

76. Lonesome Dove by Larry McMurty
77. 1984 by George Orwell
78. Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand
79. The Gospel According to Jesus Christ by Jose Saramagos
80. Grapes of Wrath by John Steinbeck
81. Of Mice and Men by John Steinbeck
82. Tristam Shandy by Laurence Sterne

83. The Tree of Man by Patrick White
84. The Glass Menagerie by Tennessee Williams
85. Meditations by Marcus Aurelius
86. 2666 by Robert Bolano

87. Cosmicomics by Italo Calvino
88. If on a winter’s night a traveler by Italo Calvino

89. The Murder of Roger Ackroyd by Agatha Christie
90. The Arrow of Gold by Joseph Conrad
91. The Recognitions by William Gaddis
92. The Castle by Franz Kafka
93. I Canti by Giacomo Leopardi
94. Man’s Fate by André Malraux
95. Death of a Salesman by Arthur Miller
96. Dance to the Music of Time by Anthony Powell
97. Portnoy’s Complaint by Philip Roth
98. Confessions by Rousseau
99. The World as Will and Representation by Arthur Schopenhauer
100. Julius Caesar by Shakespeare

How many have you read/own?

Thursday, January 10, 2013

K.J. Bishop, That Book Your Mad Ancestor Wrote

The wolf cut him off with an impatient snarl. 'Art is lust!  As a man I collected art and thought myself above the crowd.  As a beast, without a man's talent for self-flattery, I acquired a better understanding.  Art is the voluptuous language of the senses.  The artist is a pornographer.  The connoisseur is a voyeur.  Art is a euphemism that permits humans to indulge all their lusts, however base or alarming, while imagining that they are using their highest and holiest faculties.  Man can't decide whether he wants to be an angel or an ape.  Art lets him be both.' (p. 30 e-book, from "The Love of Beauty")

It has been nearly ten years since the publication of Australian writer K.J. Bishop's first book, the excellent novel The Etched City.  That novel, which contained elements of the late 19th century French Decadents (it is no accident that a quote from Lautréamont's "Poésies" is the epigraph), was one of my favorite novels when I first read it in 2003.  Ever since then, I have eagerly awaited Bishop's next book, with only a few short fiction pieces to sate temporarily my appetite for more.  Therefore, it was with great surprise and pleasure last month when I was offered by the author herself an e-copy of her December 2012 self-published story collection, That Book Your Mad Ancestor Wrote (from what I understand, a print edition may come out later this year).

That Book Your Mad Ancestor Wrote contains 19 stories over a little more than 200 iPad e-book pages that span Bishop's writing career, from 1997's "The Art of Dying" to two 2012 stories that are original to this collection.  The stories, as Bishop discusses in the notes at the end of the book, run the gamut from Decadent-influenced pieces to those inspired by some of M. John Harrison's Viriconium stories to Borgesian fables to others that are melds of other disparate elements.  In the 1999 story "The Love of Dying" (quoted above), there is a transformed wolf who speaks of his former life as a man, who became ensorcelled, first in mind and then in body, by the woman he then loved:

'I was a man once.  I wronged a woman.  I thought myself ensorcelled by her loveliness, but the only spell was the spell of my own lust.  To punish me she enchanted me in truth.  She turned me into a beast in body and mind.  The one thing I retained of my human nature was my desire for beauty.  The woman was not only an accomplished with, but a great ironist.' (p. 29 e-book)

Here, this seeming "beast" is not so much an allegorical representation of the depravities of human nature as he is of the desire for refinement, for a beauty that is beyond the grasp or even ken of human experience.  There is something about art, about beauty, that entrances humanity.  We lust for it, or at least for its representations.  If we cannot possess the winsome wife or the dashing, gallant husband, then a representation of virility or charm is the next best thing.  Bishop here explores the tangled connections between lust and love, between desire for possession and desire for creation.  It is a very fine line in life and here in her tale, the deeper implications of these alternating conflicting/complementary desires are explored with a subtlety that few authors manage to achieve.  The conversations with the beast echo those between The Rev and Gwynn in The Etched City, with much of the power found in the later novel on display here.

There are also nods to The Etched City's Gwynn in the proto-story "The Art of Dying," which was Bishop's first-completed story.  In it can be found a working out of themes and images that later appear in the novel.  There is a decadent quality to the story, as Mona's fading from life and her lingering embrace of death serves as a counterpart to the staid, almost stodgy bourgeois life which exists around her.  As she and Gwynn carry Mona toward her awaiting tomb, Vali has an experience that goes beyond time and toward something quite different:

She fell gradually into a sense of timelessness, as if Time were a woman and she a babe on Time's back, and Time had put her down, until she felt as still and untroubled as the tombs themselves and sensed a mysterious familiarity with the stars.

As she grew more deeply immersed in this state she came to an understanding that the universe was alive.  It breathed with the breath of multitudes, and it did not know loneliness. If it loved, there was nothing of need or desire in its love.  The priests of this country would say that the night's ravine was alive with God, but she couldn't imagine their God inhabiting that enormous tranquillity.  The state of grace flowed without regard for custom or for its own alienness to everything it touched. (p. 12 e-book)

This sense of the numinous pervades several of her later fictions.  There is no resolution, nothing that can be explained, only feelings that are derived from these fleeting contacts with the inexplicable.  This weird quality, of there being something unexplainable and yet often desirable, inhabits the nooks and crannies of most of Bishop's fictions here.  The reader senses it, but can't quite describe what she herself might be experiencing.  Bishop's stories puzzle and tantalize the more the reader considers the import of the fictions being read.  Bishop's careful placement of images and dialogue creates an almost hallucinatory effect within even the more mundane-seeming stories of hers.  The characters tread that narrow path between being empty vessels that will receive within them these transformative events and active actors who cause themselves these transformations of image and spoken word into something different than what first appeared to be the case.  Despite there being differences in tone and narrative between these 19 stories, there is a uniformity of quality that makes That Book Your Mad Ancestor Wrote one of the best short fiction collections I read in 2012.  Its deceptive narratives will entrance readers, perhaps lingering with them for days or weeks after the final story is read.  If literature is art and art is lust, then perhaps we are left lusting for more fiction from Bishop in the near future.  Highly recommended.




George Saunders, Tenth of December

"Are we being honest?" he said.  "Or tiptoeing around conflict?"

"Honest," I said, and his face did this thing that, for a minute, made me like him again.

"It was hard for me because I felt like a shit," he said.  "It was hard for her because she felt like a shit.  It was hard for us because while feeling like shits we were also feeling all the other things we were feeling, which, I assure you, were and are as real as anything, a total blessing, if I can say it that way."

At that point, I started feeling like a chump, like I was being held down by a bunch of guys so another guy could come over and put his New Age fist up my ass while explaining that having his fist up my ass was far from his first choice and was actually making him feel conflicted." (p. 177 e-book, from "Home")

George Saunders' latest collection, Tenth of December, is my first full introduction to his writing, although I am familiar with his name and have meant for some time to try his fiction after seeing several writers cite him as an inspiration and a help in their own writing.  What I discovered was a writer who can make the serious comic, the surreal feel ordinary, twisting and tweaking dialogue and narrative to shape the ten stories here (originally published in Harper's Magazine, McSweeney's Quarterly Concern, The New Yorker, and Story Magazine) into forms that continually grab the reader's attention because of Saunder's gift for prose.

The characters that inhabit Saunders' stories have their own unique takes on the situations in which they find themselves.  In the first story, "Victory Lap," Alison Pope serves as a counter to some of the rather insecure and yet adventuresome male classmates of her.  It is one thing to voice her ambivalence to them, yet another to do it in vivid, sparkling prose in lines such as these:

She felt hopeful that {special one} would hail from far away.  The local boys possessed a certain je ne sais quoi, which, tell the truth, she was not très crazy about, such as:  actually named their own nuts.  She had overheard that!  And aspired to work for CountyPower because the work shirts were awesome and you got them free. (p. 10 e-book)

Here, Alison's pretensions are on full display.  The mixture of high school French with her later use of "ixnay on the local boys" feels like something that someone young, somewhat better educated than her peers, and who wants to escape from her mundane live might voice.  But even more than this, she also presents a hilarious and yet all-too-true portrayal of male teens, with their named junk and modest yet enthusiastic post-school work aspirations.  It is this attention to the little quirks of the characters that makes Saunders' stories a delight to read at the sentence level as well as at the larger narrative level.

There are plots within Saunders' stories, many of them revolving around the characters' desires to find their places in a world that at times seems to be dark and frightening.  It is no accident that many of them are adolescent or young adults, as their mindsets allows for a greater sense of urgency regarding the "important issues" that older adults might find to be quaint or overblown after the nth re-experiencing of these acute mini crises.  Yet Saunders never has a condescending attitude toward these characters and their situations.  He shows their confusion, their heartbreak (such as the scene quoted at the beginning of this review from near the midpoint of "Home"), and their desire to wrest some sort of meaning from life.  At times, this means little, quiet triumphs occur by story's end, such as this one from "Escape from Spiderhead":

From across the woods, as if by common accord, birds left their trees and darted upward.  I joined them, flew among them, they did not recognize me as something apart from them, and I was happy, so happy, because for the first time in years, and forevermore, I had not killed, and never would. (p. 79 e-book)

But not all stories end on such a poignant, optimistic note.  Sometimes, the characters falter and are left searching.  There is a sense of looming disaster, perhaps due to some hitherto hidden character flaw or, as is more often the case here, the selfish action of others have dismayed, if not destroyed, the characters, such as is expression at the end of "Home":

Find some way to bring me back, you fuckers, or you are the sorriest bunch of bastards the world has ever known. (p. 190 e-book)

This may not be García Márquez's eponymous colonel saying "Shit" at the end of No One Writes to the Colonel, but it is close in terms of narrative power.  So much repressed anger and frustration is released in the final scene that this singular sentence encapsulates the entire narrative's power in a short, sharp burst of frustrated anger and depression.  Yet these moments of despair are balanced out elsewhere, such as the titular "Tenth of December," which contains a moment that is so strange, so odd, so surreal out of context that when read in context it cannot help but make most readers smile:

Allen had – Allen had said it was great.  Asked a few questions.  About the manatee.  What did they eat again?  Did he think they could effectively communicate with one another?  What a trial that must have been!  In his condition.  Forty minutes on the manatee?  Including a poem Eber had composed?  A sonnet?  On the manatee? (p. 235 e-book)

Some stories require a big bang, an explosive denouement in order to be memorable.  Saunders' stories here, however, work around those quiet moments where the characters face strange and baffling moments in which they must sink or try to swim.  His deft use of sometimes bizarre imagery and dialogue isn't done to separate the characters and their situations from our own, but instead to make us pay closer attention to what is transpiring.  Combined with plots that are effective in their subtle presentation, Tenth of December is a memorably poignant story collection that may already be of the best to be released in 2013.


Upcoming reviews

After taking most of the past 10 days off from review writing in order to take care of other matters, I have several reviews that I plan on writing in January.  While it is possible (likely?) that some of these will be delayed, here's what I would like to cover by month's end:

Next Three Days (10/10-10/12):

George Saunders, Tenth of December:  Stories (writing review after I finish this post)
K.J. Bishop, That Book Your Mad Ancestor Wrote (Thursday-Friday)
Robert Jordan and Brandon Sanderson, A Memory of Light (likely Friday, if I can stomach reading more of this; poor writing/narrative structure a bit over 50% into it as I type this)

Next Week (10/14-10/18):

Leah Stewart, The History of Us (already read)
Tamas Dobozy, Siege 13 (already read)
Amos Tutuola, Don't Pay Bad for Bad (might re-read before writing review)
Leena Krohn, Tainaron (might re-read before writing review)

Week of 10/21-10/25:

Ann VanderMeer (ed.), Steampunk III:  Steampunk Revolution (currently reading)
João Barreiros et al., Lisboa no Ano 2000 (currently reading)
Goran Petrović, An Atlas Traced by the Sky (already read)

Five January 2013 releases are included here, although I might add 1-2 more.  Depending on time/desire, might also start reviewing the Man Asian Prize shortlist (reviewed Jeet Thayil's excellent Narcopolis and read/enjoyed Tan Twan Eng's Booker Prize-nominated The Garden of Evening Mists last year) late in January or early in February.  Downloaded but haven't yet read Orhan Pamuk's Silent House and Hiromi Kawakami's The Briefcase and placed an order for a copy of Musharraf Ali Farooqi's Between Clay and Dust.  More on these in February, along with the 2013 National Book Critics Circle Awards nominees.

Wednesday, January 09, 2013

Trying to make sense of a muddled review: The Amazon Review Edition

Earlier tonight, I was linked to this Amazon reader review of Karen Lord's The Best of All Possible Worlds, a forthcoming second book from a Caribbean writer whose firs book, Redemption in Indigo, I did enjoy reading back in 2010.  I am not criticizing this review because it takes a dimmer view of Lord's novel (I haven't read it yet and some writers' second novels are poor compared to their first), but rather because the Amazon reader has written a baffling review that is hard to parse:

Echoing none other than Ursula Le Guin in her theme, literary style and execution, Karen Lord's "The Best of All Possible Worlds" is a good anthropological science fiction novel which tackles the theme of how a people can survive the cataclysmic loss of their home world, while forging new lives for themselves in exile on a distant, relatively remote, world. As such, it will appeal to those interested in reading novels - both mainstream and science fiction - that deal with peoples and cultures driven out of their ancestral lands, and forced to seek refuge elsewhere. In Lord's case, she dares to pose the question as to how uprooted peoples and cultures can survive in settings far removed from their ancestral homes. "The Best of All Possible Worlds" has been compared favorably with Paolo Bacigalupi's "The Windup Girl" and with China Mieville's "The City and the City" and "Embassytown", and yet, these are not quite apt comparisons since Lord hasn't demonstrated here neither a prose style as elegant as those employed by Mieville and Bacigalupi in their respective works, nor the considerable world building and intricate plotting all too evident in these novels, especially in Mieville's latest, which go well beyond their genre-oriented roots in becoming elaborate tales that delve into philosophy and the nature of language itself.

Thematically, "The Best of All Possible Worlds" resembles most closely, Le Guin's "The Dispossessed", but neither of her main protagonists, the exiled Sadiri Dllenahkh and the Cygnian native Grace Delarua, is as emotionally compelling as Shevek - the exiled physicist who conceives of the ansible - faster than light radio - in "The Dispossessed". Nor does Lord's prose have the almost cinema verite-like, extremely realistic, quality of Bacigalupi's early 22nd Century Bangkok, Thailand in his "The Windup Girl", or similar realism in Mieville's "The City and the City" and "Embassytown"; in the fictional locales of all three novels, readers will feel as though they are inhabiting their respective landscapes alongside the protagonists of each novel. (In Mieville's case, "Embassytown" succeeds as a grand exploration of language in fiction, as well as a compelling first contact saga; in other words, it is a brilliant novel that succeeds on a number of different levels, whereas "The Best of Both Worlds" barely succeeds as a good example of anthropological science fiction in its own right.) Nor do I find Lord's prose as compelling as anything I have read from Catherynne Valente or Nalo Hopkinson; in Hopkinson's case, she does a far more elegant job in melding Caribbean folklore and cultural traditions with intricate world-building and compelling storytelling in her fiction than what I have read in "The Best of All Possible Worlds". Readers may be enchanted with Lord's descriptions of the different societies residing on Cygnus Beta - and these are among the best reasons why one should read "The Best of All Possible Worlds" - but I regard as far more compelling, Le Guin's great work from the 1960s through 1980s - including, of course, "The Dispossessed" and "The Left Hand of Darkness" - or Mary Doria Russell's amazingly brilliant "The Sparrow", which I regard as among the finest examples of anthropological science fiction ever published, and one that still endures as a classic. Compared with these works, and especially, Mieville's "Embassytown", "The Best of All Possible Worlds" is a rather pedestrian-like anthropological science fiction novel with more than a nod or two of romance to interest readers; however, potential readers might profit more with regards to literary quality and storytelling craft by reading Bacigalupi, Hopkinson, Le Guin, Mieville and Valente first before they consider reading "The Best of All Possible Worlds". 

 I bolded the direct references to other writers in his review in order to underscore the amount of time spent mentioning other writers – Ursula Le Guin, Paolo Bacigalupi, China Miéville, Nalo Hopkinson, Mary Doria Russell, and Catherynne M. Valente – compared to discussing the qualities of Karen Lord's own writing.  Outside of a very vague description of an off-world SF setting of refugees driven to another world, I barely know anything at all about the novel's setting and plot, not to mention theme or characterization (which I esteem more than the first two narrative elements).  It would have been nice to see something substantive said about the book itself that could be found outside the cover copy/press kit blurbs.  Even Harriet Klausner sometimes makes a better effort at describing a book than this.

Now there is nothing wrong with using other stories as comparison points in order to drive home a point.  I myself occasionally do so (and will likely do so again when I write my review of the rather mediocre-to-poor final Wheel of Time novel, as I plan on comparing it to Steven Erikson's closing book in his "main" Malazan Book of the Fallen series), but one has to be very careful when it comes to using points of relation in writing a review or critique.  It is one thing to take a specific element (say, the treatment of a specific culture and its practitioners) and to compare like quantities.  It is a very different matter to make passing references to other books that have only a tangential connection.  Having read all six of the writers that this Amazon reviewer, John Kwok, name drops here, I was left scratching my head as to what in the hell he was trying to compare.  Was The Best of All Possible Worlds a poorer look at anarchism?  Did it try to make – and fail spectacularly and doing so – a pointed statement on social and physical capital like Bacigalupi's problematic novel?  Did it just not have enough monsters and even more underdeveloped "cool ideas" vis-à-vis Miéville?  Was the first contact theme less interesting than Russell's?  Was the beauty of the writing not like Valente's?  Or was it just simply not enough on Caribbean culture(s), at least compared to Hopkinson? 

Based on what Kwok has written, it's hard to say anything more about Lord's strengths and weaknesses here because all the reader gets to work with is a laundry list of disparate writers/books that when viewed in the aggregate make as much sense as if I were to start listing the following animals and compare them to the glories/depravities of the American gray squirrel:  turkeys, slugs, reindeer, fruit bats, quokkas, llamas, and fennecs.  It just wouldn't make sense, just like Kwok's review makes little sense when examined closely.  All the reader can take from his review is that he likes the writers he mentioned and Lord not so much.  Hell if we are supposed to know what Lord's story is really about, since there is less description of it than can be found in the product description.  Reviewers should be careful not to overdo comparisons, as the result can be as muddled and cringe-worthy as Kwok's review proved to be.

I am livetweeting my reactions to the last WoT book

Since it'll be a day or so before I bother writing a review of A Memory of Light, for those who want to see (mostly) spoiler-free reactions that I'm having to the book, you can follow this hashtag, #WoTTF, on Twitter.  Here are a few choice tweets that should give you a better sense of my reactions so far:

I feel like I'm reading non-erotic pornography as I read more WoT

Worst part is that I find myself reading much slower than normal in order to quote from this dreck.  


I think my access to reading squirrels has been blocked for this :(


I have lived for a little over 1.2 billion seconds. Too many have been wasted on bad novels.  

At the moment of writing this post, I've read about 1/4 of the novel, not including the reading of the final 50 pages, about which I'll say more later this week.  Let's just say that I won't be having my comments blurbed for the paperback edition anytime soon.
 
 
Add to Technorati Favorites