The OF Blog: Best of 2011
Showing posts with label Best of 2011. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Best of 2011. Show all posts

Saturday, December 31, 2011

2011 in Review: The 25 Most Notable 2011 Releases

As is custom here at this blog, the final post of the year is devoted to the year's releases that I believe are most deserving of attention.  As I said previously, my reading has shifted more to those fictions that are either not speculative at all or they simply are not marketed as such.  In interests of self-disclosure, I eliminated two books from consideration for this list due to them having translations of mine published.  I do believe, however, that if I didn't have this conflict of interest, that I certainly would have had the Ann and Jeff VanderMeer-edited The Weird and ODD? at least would have made the longlist and the former most likely would have been a Top 5 selection.  So feel free to add those to the "notable" list even if I won't be listing them below.

This year, I'm going to list these notable releases in reverse order, with commentaries reserved for the top five books:

25.  Erin Morgenstern, The Night Circus

24.  David Anthony Durham, The Sacred Band

23.  Stephen Greenblatt, The Swerve:  How the World Became Modern

22.  Moacyr Scliar, Kafka's Leopards

21.  R. Scott Bakker, The White-Luck Warrior

20.  Jesmyn Ward, Salvage the Bones

19.  Julie Otsuka, Buddha in the Attic

18.  David Abulafia, The Great Sea

17.  Haruki Murakami, 1Q84

16.  Debby Dahl Edwardson, My Name is Not Easy

15.  Helen Oyeyemi, Mr. Fox

14.  Andrew Krivak, The Sojourn

13.  Catherynne M. Valente, The Folded World

12.  Jesse Ball, The Curfew

11.  Karen Russell, Swamplandia!

10.  Anders Nilsen, Big Questions

9.  Carlos Ruiz Zafón, El Prisionero del Cielo

8.  Javier Marías, Los enamoramientos

7.  Péter Nádas, Parallel Stories

6.  Michael Cisco, The Great Lover


 5.  Colson Whitehead, Zone One

Zone One manages to do something I thought would be nigh-impossible:  get me interested in a story that has zombies.  Looking beyond Whitehead's near-tone perfect prose (if such a thing is possible; the prose is integral to the story), he hints at moving, tragic stories in just a few sparse descriptions of the more benign zombies' appearances and the places they haunt.  Too often the focus of zombie fiction is on the "BRRRAAAAINNNNSSSSSS!" aspect of shoot or be munched upon.  What Whitehead does here is turn everything around and explore the idea of a zombie apocalypse through the traumas of the survivors, showing the world (itself often resembling the mindlessness associated with the undead) as a much more complex and brutal place than what is typically glossed over in zombie fiction.  The thoughts and digressions of the protagonist "Mark Spitz" (the origins of this cognomen is revealed late in the novel) serve to accentuate the emotional state of someone who may be killing more than the straggling remnants of a decayed, corruptible society.


4.  Thanhha Lai, Inside Out and Back Again

I reviewed this National Book Award-winning YA novel last month, so I'll keep my thoughts relatively brief here.  Lai's story was one of the most moving I read, in part because of my two years teaching immigrant students in Florida a decade ago.  The emotion that underlies Lai's simple, direct poem/prose lines is powerful because it is not just a single note played over and over again, but a multitude of emotions, many of which are jumbled up in the narrator's mind, that build a complex, moving story out of fragments and youthful (mis)understandings of the world.


3.  Blake Butler, There is No Year

When I reviewed Butler's book back in July, I described it as being:

"Using a mixture of disturbing scenes (the footnoted section on the photographs the son receives a little over halfway through the novel might be one of the most chilling things that I have read in years) and short, staccato passages, Butler has crafted a novel that will linger long in the reader's mind and even longer in her subconscious after the final page has been turned.  Not many narratives prove to be the stuff of which dreams (or nightmares) are made, but There Is No Year might be one of those rare examples.  It is one of the most original, disturbing, moving novels that I have read in 2011 and it certainly will be part of my annual Best of Year reflective essays."

Those thoughts still stand, as this fractured, weird fiction still lingers in my head nearly six months later.


2.  Téa Obreht, The Tiger's Wife

Ever since I read and reviewed The Tiger's Wife right after its March release, I had thought it would be the favorite to be my top selection.  It certainly is worthy, as it won this year's Orange Prize and was a finalist for the National Book Award for Fiction.  Obreht's combination of a poignant war story (drawing in part upon her own experiences as a refugee from the fighting in the former Yugoslavia in the 1990s), a family narrative, and magical elements creates a powerful novel that I certainly will re-read with delight in the years to come.

Yet there is another book that has haunted me ever since I read it back in September.  I have not reviewed it in large part because of it, but it is one of those novels that might stay with me for a lifetime, a rarity in this day and age of disposable novels that are obsolete within six months.  Like five others on this list, it's a debut novel and this book may signal the rise of an important new writer in American literature.


1.  Justin Torres, We the Animals

At 128 pages the shortest book on this list, We the Animals belies its brevity with its ability to pack an emotional punch.  It is an autobiographical novel featuring three boys of a mixed-race marriage of two working class individuals who struggle with their situations.  Told from the perspective of the youngest child, the novel unfolds as a series of short, sharp vignettes (rarely more than three or four pages) that show the casual brutality of their lives.  Take for instance this passage devoted to the narrator's seventh birthday:

In the morning, we stood side by side in the doorway and looked in on Ma, who slept open-mouthed, and we listened to the air struggle to get past the saliva in her throat.  Three days ago she had arrived home with both cheeks swollen purple.  Paps had carried her into the house and brought her to the bed, where he stroked her hair and whispered in her ear.  He told us the dentist had been punching on her after she went under; he said that's how they loosen up the teeth before they rip them out.  Ma had been in bed every day since – plastic vials of pain pills, glasses of water, half-drunk mugs of tea, and bloody tissues cluttered the floor around her bed.  Paps had forbidden us to set foot in the bedroom, and for three mornings we had heeded, monitoring her breath from the doorway, but today we would not wait any longer. (p. 12)

So much is contained within this paragraph.  We see the lies that parents will tell to cover up their abuses, the mystery surrounding what could have led to it (the actions of both parents continually puzzle the children throughout the novel), the combination of curiosity and quick acceptance of what the father says – an entire other story laying beneath what is outlined here.  Torres does not linger upon the many events of this childhood; we see the traumas and the brutalities and the humiliations that parents and children alike endure and we may paint for ourselves according to the numbers embedded within the plot.  Torres' decision to pare We the Animals down to its narrative bones allows readers to develop their own conclusions.  For myself, being a teacher of emotionally and behaviorally disturbed children, what he describes resembles what so many of my former students have told or hinted to me over the past three years.

We the Animals is a searing reading experience.  We see the heartaches, the confusion, the outburst of tempers.  We see children neglected for most of their lives.  We see the struggles that the narrator has with his own sexual identity as he ages and how that impacts the family.  Torres easily could have provided a nice, pat ending where either everyone comes together or some other emotional/developmental milestone is reached.  Instead, he purposely concludes at the point where the narrator begins a new stage in his life as a young adult.  These lingering questions about how casual violence can be, how neglect occurs, and how children deal with traumas have no easy answers; sometimes, there are no answers at all.  We the Animals is one of those rare novels that captures the darker sides of families without becoming mawkish.  It simply is the most brilliantly executed novel published this year that I've read and therefore the most notable 2011 release.

Thursday, December 29, 2011

2011 in Review: Overlooked Books and Genres

I'm a little bit later than usual in starting the main year-end review posts, so this will be shorter than usual for me.  In 2011, I set out to read a wider variety of literature than in previous years, at least for the year's releases.  You may have noticed that when I posted the longlist over the overall year's best, there were not many works published/marketed as fantasies or science fiction.  This reflects my changing attitudes toward those two related literary genres; not as much interested me this year that came from there.  This is not to say that there aren't several fictions that utilize some of the tropes associated with those two particular genres, as there are several enjoyable titles that did touch upon it, but for myself, the more enjoyable fictions tended to come from authors that could blend several literary influences into something that felt fresher and more inventive.

Yet try as I may, there were going to be some areas that were not covered much (or at all) in my reading or in my posts on this blog.  I have no inclination toward reading romance novels, whether they be of the Harlequin mode or the paranormal romances so often associated these days with "urban fantasy."  This is not to attack these popular brands (even if I have found the few times that I've glanced at them the sort of writing and characterizations that make them so unappealing to me), but a brief comment explaining why such are not covered here (and likely will never be as long as I am blogging here).

But there are other genres and modes of narration that I do enjoy that I just feel I could not claim with justice to have covered adequately.  The first is Young Adult fiction.  Those who are familiar with me know that I do read and enjoy YA fiction on occasion, albeit titles that are more "realist" than "speculative" in nature.  One of the great joys this year was getting to read and review the finalists for the 2011 National Book Award for Young People's Literature (click on this link to see how I "ranked" these and others in the various categories).  Yet outside of these finalists, I read very little YA fiction this year (I can only think of the book publication of Catherynne M. Valente's The Girl Who Circumnavigated Fairyland in a Ship of Her Own Making; it previously was published online and was a finalist – and I think winner – of the Norton Award for YA spec fic this past year at the Nebula Awards banquet; very good book, I might add), so it would not be a representative list to just note six books read that are classified by marketers as YA.

Likewise with graphic novels.  I have completed two excellent graphic novels that were published this year, Anders Nilsen's stunning Big Questions, a book that is already on my longlist.  The same goes to the collection of Kate Beaton's eponymous webcomic, Hark! A Vagrant, which made me smile in near-laughter on several occasions (okay, I might actually have laughed aloud a bit).  Craig Thompson's Habibi would possibly have been considered if I had the time to finish it, but it and a few others will have to await until next year before I get to them.

Speaking of unread 2011 releases that I do plan on reading in the very near future:

Drew Magary, The Postmortal

David Lodge, A Man of Parts

Carlo Ginzburg, Threads and Traces:  True False Fictive (non-fiction)

Although I am reading more non-fiction, I am not doing a category this year due to not feeling it is comprehensive enough (unlike prior years, where I should have eschewed posting).  But there were several excellent non-fictions I read this year, including the National Book Award finalists in Non-Fiction that can be found in the link above.  The same goes, including links, to poetry published this year.

I've only read three fictions published in other languages this year.  Of those three, I would recommend them all, but would probably start with Javier Marías' outstanding Los enamoramientos, followed closely by Carlos Ruiz Zafón's El Prisionero del Cielo and a bit further back, Tibor Moricz's O Peregrino (Brazilian Portuguese; the others are Spanish), which I also found to be enjoyable.

I don't read many translated fictions these days due to wanting to read them in their native language whenever possible, but there were four titles released in English translation in 2011 that I thought were great or at least worthy of discussion:

Moacyr Scliar, Kafka's Leopards (Brazilian Portuguese; would have bought this if available).  Oh, this was a great, short novel to read.

Péter Nádas, Parallel Stories (Hungarian, which I don't read at all).  There are a few flaws, but the scope and technique are very, very impressive.  Will likely review this in the coming year, possibly on Gogol's Overcoat.

Haruki Murakami, 1Q84 (Japanese).  It is my second completed Murakami novel (the other was the World Fantasy Award-winning Kafka on the Shore) and it is nearly as good as that.

Gonçalo M. Tavares, Learning to Pray in the Age of Technique (Portuguese; again not available via Amazon in the original).  The narrative style Tavares employs in following the rise and fall of a dictator is excellent.

Later this week, I will have two essays devoted to the realist and speculative fictions that I read in 2011, followed by the best 25 2011 releases that I read this year.  One hint (and the reason why I'm not doing a post on debut novels):  the winner is a debut novel.  Another hint:  it's not who you think it is (I haven't reviewed this book yet).

Saturday, December 24, 2011

Best of 2011: The Longlist

For those who want to guess which titles will make the final 20/25, here are the ones currently under consideration (in no order but a rough chronological read order, with a few added latter due to oversight):

1.  Karen Russell, Swamplandia!

2.  Téa Obreht, The Tiger's Wife

3.  R. Scott Bakker, The White-Luck Warrior

4.  David Albahari, Leeches

5.  Michael Cisco, The Great Lover

6.  Blake Butler, There is No Year

7.  David Anthony Durham, The Sacred Band

8.  Ben Loory, Stories for Nighttime and Some for the Day

9.  Nnedi Okorafor, Akata Witch

10. Peter Beagle, Sleight of Hand

11.  Umberto Eco, Confessions of a Young Novelist

12.  Jesse Ball, The Curfew

13.  Lev Grossman, The Magician King

14.  Carol Birch, Jamrach's Menagerie

15.  Glen Duncan, The Last Werewolf

16.  Donald Ray Pollock, The Devil All the Time

17.  Patrick Dewitt, The Sisters Brothers

18.  Kevin Wilson, The Family Fang

19.  Lászlo Krasznahorkai and Max Neumann, Animalinside

20.  Mary Horlock, The Book of Lies

21.  Anders Nilsen, Big Questions

22.  Stuart Nadler, The Book of Life

23.  Tom Perrotta, The Leftovers

24.  Justin Torres, We the Animals

25.  Gonçalo M. Tavares, Learning to Pray in the Age of Technique

26.  Chad Harbach, The Art of Fielding

27.  Denis Johnson, Train Dreams 

28.  Amy Waldman, The Submission

29.  Javier Marías, Los enamoramientos

30.  Mercé Rodoreda, The Selected Stories of Mercé Rodoreda

31.  Kate Beaton, Hark! A Vagrant

32.  Erin Morgenstern, The Night Circus

33.  Helen Oyeyemi, Mr. Fox

34.  Moacyr Scliar, Kafka's Leopards

35.  Julie Otsuka, The Buddha in the Attic

36.  Jesmyn Ward, Salvage the Bones

37.  Andrew Krivak, The Sojourn

38.  Colson Whitehead, Zone One

39.  Thanhha Lai, Inside Out and Back Again

40.  Gary D. Schmidt, Okay for Now

41.  Stephen Greenblatt, The Swerve:  How the World Became Modern

42.  Umberto Eco and Jean-Claudde Carrière, This is Not the End of the Book

43.  David Abulafia, The Great Sea

44.  Debby Dahl Edwardson, My Name is Not Easy

45.  Manning Marable, Malcolm X:  A Life of Reinvention

46.  Carlos Ruiz Zafón, El Prisionero del Cielo

47.  Russell Banks, Lost Memory of Skin

48.  Lavie Tidhar, Osama

49.  Haruki Murakami, 1Q84

50.  Thomas Frick, The Iron Boys


 In addition, there are three novels that may be finished by the 29th (my cutoff date for the overall list) that could crack this list, if complete by then:

Nick Mamatas, Sensation

Catherynne M. Valente, The Folded World

Péter Nádas, Parallel Stories


How many of these books have you read?  Which ones do you want to know more about?  Which one/s do you think will atop my list?

Friday, December 16, 2011

Books that will not appear on my Best of 2011 overall list

Different people have different tastes.  If you hope to read a bunch of epic fantasies on my Best of 2011 overall list, you will be sorely disappointed.  I found this past year's crop to be rather disappointing as a whole, despite a very good middle volume from Scott Bakker (I see to like his middle volumes the best; hope that doesn't bode ill for his next book) and series closer by David Anthony Durham.  So with that in mind, here are 12 of the books that will not make a Top 20/25 (maybe even a Top 50) list from me and brief reasons why they will not be considered for even a longlist:

Joe Abercrombie, The Heroes (it was a dull and tedious read replete of the same old tired clichés that I've seen executed better by other authors; happened to be my least favorite work by him)

Daniel Abraham, The Dragon's Path (a bit light for a new series opener, although there is hope for the sequels to be stronger, as in his previous series)

Julian Barnes, The Sense of an Ending (novellas that should be too slight for major literary prizes are not making my shortlist of best fiction)

Gail Carriger, Heartless (good addition to the series, but at times the conceit was tedious to read)

Ernest Cline, Ready Player One (I grew up a jock in the late 80s and early 90s, so seeing this sort of setting glorified puzzles me, as the story is more suitable for a popcorn summer blockbuster flick than for any sort of weighty novel)

Steven Erikson, The Crippled God (better than the previous volume, of which this forms the latter half of the final sequence, but a bit too uneven for me to consider it for the overall best)

Maeve Gilmore and Mervyn Peake, Titus Awakes (Frankensteinish post-mortem revivals don't make for the best novels)

George R.R. Martin, A Dance With Dragons (parts of it were wonderful, but much of it was dull)

China Miéville, Embassytown (the language conceit was overplayed in some quarters; the execution was lacking in the middle third to half of the novel)

A.D. Miller, Snowdrops (how this tepid suckfest of a novel made it on the Booker Prize shortlist still baffles me)

Patrick Rothfuss, The Wise Man's Fear (I've had the book for nine months now and still can't muster the enthusiasm to read it, so it certainly won't appear on the list)

Brandon Sanderson, The Alloy of Law (It was light-adventurish enough to divert, but not solid enough to linger in my memory)





Wednesday, December 14, 2011

The dilemma of writing year-end lists

In the 10 days or so, I'm going to begin writing a bunch of posts regarding my 2011 reading, with some concentration on 2011 releases.  Having done something in some form on this blog since 2004, it has become as much an obligation as it is an opportunity for reflection.  I am a surprisingly (at least to myself) conscientious reader in that I take note of what I've read and I look to see if there are any trends that span months or years.  Sometimes, the results of this self-searching are unexpected (like the precipitous drop in category SF/F books I've read over the past two years) while at other times there's nothing shocking (such as the number of non-English language books read usually ranges from 50-100 a year).

But the problem I face the most in writing out these observations is that it's hard to tell what my "core audience" is these days.  It was easy back in the 2004-2008 period, when I largely blogged about "core genre" works, particularly new releases.  But now, when the last fantasy-marketed book was read/reviewed in October and not many in that month or the preceding couple? 

Maybe that's an overly pessimistic view.  I know there will be very little to no overlap with what you might find on the more popular SF/F-oriented sites like The Wertzone (which I think is now the largest single-person SF/F blog I keep track of), Pat's Fantasy Hotlist, A Dribble of Ink, or others similar to them.  This is not a bad or good thing; it's just that my tastes are different from what I've seen covered on their blogs. 

What I have noticed in previous years is that some commentators who frequent multiple blogs seem to judge each blog's list by his/her previous familiarity with the books on it.  Using a hypothetical here, let's say a poster found Patrick Rothfuss' The Wise Man's Fear (a book I own but have not had the desire to read and likely won't this year) to be the best book, irrespective of literary genre, of the year.  If say Pat "ranks" the book as his 17th best book and Adam ranks it as his 5th (totally arbitrary numbers, mind you), that hypothetical poster might declare Pat's list to be garbage while praising Adam's, even if that were the only book on either list that this hypothetical poster had read.  Can you imagine the dismissals I might get when I not only admit that Rothfuss' book has not been read but that there will likely be very few, if any, "core genre" books on a possible Top 50 list (no, I'm not writing a list of that length; separate posts will cover the majority of the books that would appear on a top whatever list)?

Conversely, there are those hypothetical readers who hope that a particular reviewer's top whatever list will contain books they've only heard mentioned in passing, if at all.  Maybe that reader wants something different than Hack and Slash, vol. 20 and is willing to try Jesse Ball's The Curfew or Moacyr Scliar's Kafka's Leopards, for example.  Then maybe a top whatever list, or even better a series of related essays on books read, will intrigue that reader and get her/him to try some older fictions as well as new.  Perhaps one can read afresh Carl Sandburg's poetry or Sufi poetry. 

This of course brings the problem back full circle.  In order to attract any attention, a lot of effort has to be expended highlighting the likely "obscure" books, only for little notice to be taken by the majority of readers because they haven't heard of the books from their other, likely more favored, sources.  It truly is a dilemma in deciding how much effort should be spent highlighting works, as it sometimes takes the "trojan horse" approach of mixing the populist (and possible mediocre) in with the brilliant and likely obscure work.  One runs the risk of diluting the quality of the list.  Let's face it, if I were to have a list with Aimee Bender, Zoran Živković, Milorad Pavić, Thomas Ligotti, and Michael Cisco on it and then tossed in Terry Brooks and Terry Goodkind to make the list more recognizable to readers, the dishonesty in doing so would be so obvious to those who are at least vaguely aware of the first five readers that I would risk losing all credibility as a literary critic/reviewer.  Needless to say, if one were trying to sell books, it would be the heavy inclusion of the Ciscos of the world that would dampen bookseller confidence in promoting such a list.  Thus the world, like the worm, turns.

So what to do?  In my case, it'll be me writing a list for the "fortunate few" who might discover the authors I discuss long after their books are published.  Maybe there might be the odd decently-selling work on there (chances are decent one megaseller will be mentioned this year, something involving a city associated with a dragon), but almost certainly there will be a slew of books that defy easy categorization, except maybe for the epithet of "damn good book."  Hopefully, readers will be willing to pick up a few of the books I discuss that aren't being discussed heavily elsewhere.  But that's out of my hands, no?

Sunday, October 30, 2011

A look at books being considered for my year-end Best of 2011: Novels

Yes, it's nearly two months away before I start writing those series of posts reflecting back on the year that was and the best 2011 releases that I've read.  Based on current reading numbers (should finish #436 and #437 today), looks as though I will have read over 500 books by year's end.  After a slow start, over a hundred of these will be 2011 releases and several of those will have been either debut novels or debut collections.  A bit more non-fiction was read this year than in year's past and there will be a decent number of non-English and translated fictions to note this year as well.  A few more YA titles (perhaps enough for me to justify a separate post) and the odd graphic novel or three are also possibly on the docket.

Over the past few years, I have consciously moved away from covering only marketed fantasy and SF on this blog.  Although this probably has caused some consternation among (former?) readers, as I have seen a noticeable decline in page views over the past 14 months (some of that likely due as well to working 40-60 hour weeks and not being as active online), I do hope that this longlist of books in a few of the categories I plan on covering will appeal to those readers who want more than seeing me repeat what they can find mentioned on other fine blogs and websites that do concentrate on core genre fictions.  2011 has been a good reading year for me, perhaps the most diverse in its quality and narrative styles in several years, and these titles should reflect this.

Note:  I'll be listing titles based on reading chronology, so there isn't any ranking involved:

Novels (Realist, Weird, and Speculative):

Bradford Morrow, The Diviner's Tale

J.M. McDermott, Never Knew Another

Karen Russell, Swamplandia!

Téa Obreht, The Tiger's Wife

Steven Erikson, The Crippled God

R. Scott Bakker, The White-Luck Warrior

David Foster Wallace, The Pale King

David Albahari, Leeches

Michael Cisco, The Great Lover

China Miéville, Embassytown

Chris Adrian, The Great Night

Minister Faust, The Alchemists of Kush

Blake Butler, There is No Year

David Anthony Durham, The Sacred Band

Genevieve Valentine, Mechanique:  A Tale of the Tresaulti

Ransom Riggs, Miss Peregrine's Home for Peculiar Children

George R.R. Martin, A Dance With Dragons

Jesse Ball, Samedi the Darkness

Lev Grossman, The Magician King

Carol Birch, Jamrach's Menagerie

Glen Duncan, The Last Werewolf

Donald Ray Pollock, The Devil All the Time

Alice LaPlante, Turn of Mind

Elanor Henderson, Ten Thousand Saints

Patrick Dewitt, The Sisters Brothers

Kevin Wilson, The Family Fang

László Krasznahorkai and Max Neumann, Animalinside

Mary Horlock, The Book of Lies

Tom Perrotta, The Leftovers

Justin Torres, We the Animals

Chad Harbach, The Art of Fielding

Amy Waldman, The Submission

Erin Morgenstern, The Night Circus

Caitlin Sweet, The Pattern Scars

Helen Oyeyemi, Mr. Fox

Kameron Hurley, Infidel

Moacyr Scliar, Kafka's Leopards (translation)

Julie Otsuka, The Buddha in the Attic

Jesmyn Ward, Salvage the Bones

Andrew Krivak, The Sojourn

Colson Whitehead, Zone One

Stewart O'Nan, Emily, Alone

Graham Joyce, The Silent Land (US release was in 2011)

Thanhha Lai, Inside Out and Back Again

Amit Majmudar, Partitions 


45 novels listed here, yet there are several others I'm working on for November and December (Péter Nádas' Parallel Stories, released in English translation last week, is a massive tome I hope to finish in the next week or two).  Later today or tomorrow, I will list the longlists for other categories.  I like to think that this longlist above ought to pique the interest of some here.  If so, which titles strike your fancy?
 
Add to Technorati Favorites